Fri Dec 20 2024 • 13 min Read
Smallest AI vs Sarvam AI
Compare Smallest.ai vs Sarvam.ai for TTS, Voice Cloning, ASR, and STT. Explore differences in voice quality, language support, latency, and pricing.
Kaushal Choudhary
Senior Developer Advocate
India’s AI Voice space features standout players like Smallest.ai and Sarvam.ai. Smallest.ai focuses on delivering lightweight, scalable Text-to-Speech (TTS) models for business applications, while Sarvam.ai emphasizes democratizing AI for Indic languages with inclusive TTS, ASR, and Translation solutions. This article compares their TTS capabilities across fidelity, features, scalability, customization, and pricing to highlight their unique value.
Smallest.ai vs Sarvam.ai, a quick overview
Feature | Smallest | Sarvam |
---|---|---|
Languages Supported | 50+ | 10+ Indian Languages |
Total Number of Voices | 100+ | 6 |
Voice Quality | Hyper-realistic and tone matching. | High-quality voice with Indian accents. |
Character Limits | 2500 characters on Studio. | No Studio. |
Latency | sub-100ms for 10 sec of audio + network time. | ~800ms for 10 sec of audio + network time. |
Price | $0.03 per minute for TTS and $0.045 for voice cloning. | Rs 15/10k Characters. |
Voice Cloning | Professional Voice Cloning, with minimal latency | No Voice Cloning. |
ASR | No ASR. | ASR for Indic Languages. |
API | API access for all tier users. | API access for all tier users. |
Comparing Text to Speech
Smallest.ai's TTS platform uses the advanced Lightning model to deliver sub-100ms latency and hyper-realistic voice cloning. Sarvam.ai's Bulbul focuses on multilingual TTS, supporting 10 Indic languages and English to meet the diverse linguistic needs of India.
The below text is a Sentences with Numbers which tests the pronunciation of numbers and their natural integration into sentences.
The company reported a 15.4% increase in revenue over the last quarter.
let's see how both of the TTS perform.
Lightning by smallest.ai
Bulbul by Sarvam
Supported languages
Smallest.ai currently supports 50+ languages, whereas Sarvam supports 10 Indic Languages.
Size of voice library
Smallest.ai also supports 100+ voices with rich languages and dialects and Sarvamsupports 10+ voices mostly for Indic languages and dialects.
Latency
Smallest.ai offers cutting-edge TTS and instant voice cloning capabilities with an impressive response time of under 100ms, all while preserving fidelity, tone, and volume. In comparison, Sarvam's TTS demonstrates a higher latency of 600 ms.
API Support
Both Smallest and Sarvam offer APIs for seamless access to their TTS services.
Smallest.ai
import requests
url = "https://waves-api.smallest.ai/api/v1/lightning/get_speech"
payload = {
"voice_id": "emily",
"text": "I am feeling so tired, मुझे थोड़ी देर आराम करना चाहिए।",
"sample_rate": 24000,
"add_wav_header": True
}
headers = {
"Authorization": f"Bearer {SMALLEST_API_KEY}",
"Content-Type": "application/json"
}
response = requests.request("POST", url, json=payload, headers=headers)
if response.status_code == 200:
with open("smallest.wav", "wb") as audio_file:
audio_file.write(response.content)
Smallest.ai also provides SDK which can be used for faster generation and provides more customizable options. Learn more here.
from smallest import Smallest
client = Smallest(api_key="SMALLEST_API_KEY")
client.synthesize(
text="I am feeling so tired, मुझे थोड़ी देर आराम करना चाहिए।",
voice="mithali",
save_as="smallestai.wav"
)
Sarvam.ai
Sarvam does not provide any SDK.
import requests
url = "https://api.sarvam.ai/text-to-speech"
payload = {
"inputs": "The sun set behind the mountains, painting the sky in hues of orange and pink.",
"target_language_code": "en-IN",
"speaker": "meera",
"pitch": 0,
"pace": 1.65,
"loudness": 1.5,
"speech_sample_rate": 8000,
"enable_preprocessing": False,
"model": "bulbul:v1"
}
headers = {
"API-Subscription-Key": "SARVAM_API_KEY",
"Content-Type": "application/json"
}
response = requests.request("POST", url, json=payload, headers=headers)
if response.status_code == 200:
with open("sarvam.wav", "wb") as audio_file:
audio_file.write(response.content)
Pricing
Smallest.ai provides TTS and Instant Voice Cloning Studio, enabling users to generate speech and create multiple voice clones with ease. Its basic plan starts at just $5 per month, offering 3 hours of audio generation, support for up to 8 voice clones, and TTS costs as low as $0.028 per minute. The plan also includes full API access across multiple languages. On the other hand, Sarvam.ai does not offer a Creator Studio but provides API-based access for its services. Pricing is set per service, with TTS available at ₹15 per 10,000 characters and STT (Speech-to-Text) priced at ₹30 per hour, making it a straightforward choice for specific use cases.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Smallest.ai stands out in Text-to-Speech and voice cloning, offering exceptional speed, quality, and customization, making it the perfect choice for businesses in need of reliable, scalable solutions. While Sarvam.ai excels in Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) and translation services for Indic languages and dialects, its TTS performance falls short. If your use case requires robust translation and ASR services focused on Indic languages, Sarvam.ai could be a solid option. However, for advanced TTS capabilities, Smallest.ai is the clear leader.
Recent Blog Posts
Interviews, tips, guides, industry best practices, and news.
Top 5 Speechify Alternatives for High-Quality Audio-Books
Explore the Top 5 Speechify Alternatives for audiobook creation: Compare pricing, audio quality, latency, and use case fit to find the best TTS for your needs.
Top 5 Alternatives to ElevenLabs in TTS
Explore top ElevenLabs alternatives like Smallest.ai, Cartesia, Resemble AI, Speechify, and FakeYou. Compare latency, pricing, fidelity, and use cases.
Smallest AI vs Cartesia
Compare Smallest.ai vs Cartesia for TTS and Voice Cloning. Explore differences in voice quality, speed, emotional context, API features, and pricing.